Several
people have recently asked me about the status of proposed legislation in
Tennessee to abolish the collateral source rule. Many of you will recall that in the 2013
legislative session a bill on this issue was proposed called the “Phantom
Damages Elimination Act”. This bill was SB 1184/HB 0978. The Legislative
website page that will provide you with updates on this bill can be found here. This bill would effectively abolish the
collateral source rule in Tennessee.
There
were many discussions about this bill in 2013.
In fact, in 2013 the Senate Judiciary Committee decided to establish a
study committee to study the impact of this bill over the summer and fall of
2013. In the 2013 hearings it was stated
that the bill would be brought back in 2014 pursuant to the request of Senator
Tracy, who sponsored the bill in the Senate.
So the question is, what happened in the recently ended 2014 Tennessee
legislative session?
The
answer to this question is simply – nothing happened! The bill was only called up on one occasion
on January 14, 2014 in the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Chair of the Senate Judiciary
Committee,
Brian Kelsey made one comment
about the bill at that time. He said
simply “at the sponsor’s request that has been rolled to the last calendar” – see the video of
the hearing here. That is the only official insight we can
obtain on this bill at this time. There
was no discussion or revelation of the results of the “study committee” that
was established in the 2013 session. The
bill was never called up again according to the Tennessee legislature’s
website. The House appears to have not
even called it up in any committee.
So
what happened? It was a hot topic in
2013 that was discussed in several committee hearings and there were many
articles posted in the media and on attorney’s websites discussing this
possible legislation. At this time, I
simply cannot tell what happened. I did
a Google search and could not find any substantive discussion about why it was
not addressed in the 2014 Legislative session.
As a result, I am at a loss to explain why it was not addressed. I can only guess that there must have been
behind the scenes discussions that somehow prevented this from coming up in
2014. Maybe it was because of all of the
other hot button issues that came up in the session. Maybe it was because of effective lobbying by
the Tennessee plaintiff’s bar. Maybe it
was because the “study committee” is late on their homework. I simply do not know.
For
those who are not aware, the collateral source rule prevents a defendant from
introducing evidence that the injured plaintiff received payments from any
other source to try to reduce or mitigate the damages sustained by the
plaintiff. The Tennessee Court of
Appeals in Fye v. Kennedy,
991 S.W. 2d 754, 763 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998) stated that:
An injured party's right to recover his or
her “reasonable and necessary expenses” must be viewed in connection with the
collateral source rule:
Normally, of course, in an action for
damages in tort, the fact that the plaintiff has received payments from a
collateral source, other than the defendant, is not admissible in evidence and
does not reduce or mitigate the defendant's liability.
The
proposed SB 1184/HB 0978 would effectively
eliminate the collateral source rule in Tennessee. In fact, the language in the bill would only
allow a plaintiff in a personal injury or wrongful death case to recover
economic damages for medical and other costs of medical care for:
(1) The amount actually paid by or
on behalf of the claimant;
(2) Any amount necessary to cover
unpaid medical expenses;
(3) Any amount necessary to satisfy
future medical charges.
Once
again, I will follow this issue in the 2015 Tennessee Legislative session. If any of my readers know why this bill was
not brought up, please let me know so I can pass along the information to
everyone.
Follow me on Twitter at @jasonalee for updates from the Tennessee Defense
Litigation site.
|