|
Posted on Jun 20 2015 4:29PM by Attorney, Jason A. Lee
|
The Tennessee legislature in Public Chapter No. 114 clarified Tennessee
law on who is considered the employer of franchisee employees. This was signed into law by Governor Bill
Haslam on April 10, 2015 and took effect immediately. Specifically, employees of franchisees as
well as franchisees themselves will not be “deemed to be an employee of the
franchisor for any purpose.” This
obviously is important in several different areas of the law. It can certainly be important for numerous
employment law issues including Tennessee employee discrimination or fair labor
standard cases. Additionally, if
employees are deemed to be employed by a franchisor, this could lead to an
increased level of litigation against franchisors for claims based in premises
liability or automobile liability (when a franchisee is involved in an incident
or claim).
The Tennessee legislature felt it was
important to clarify this issue mainly because of concerns for litigation as
well as recent changes in the law on this issue at the national level. The NLRB recently found that McDonald’s corporation
is a joint employer of franchisee employees and is therefore responsible for
the actions of the franchisee on labor related issues. This has caused great concern among
franchisor’s for their possible joint liability in certain circumstances.
This new law in Tennessee is an attempt to
clarify that under Tennessee law, franchisors will not be considered employers
of franchisee employees. This does not
mean that the Federal NLRB findings are nullified. However, it is a step in the right direction
within the context of Tennessee law to protect the important legal separate relationship
between franchisors and franchisees. The
entire statute will be found in TCA Title 50, Chapter 1, Part 2 (it has not yet
been assigned a formal statute number at this time). The new statute in its entirety provides as
follows:
(a) Notwithstanding any voluntary
agreement entered into between the United States department of labor and a
franchisee, neither a franchisee nor a franchisee's employee shall be deemed to...
|
Continue
Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|