|
Posted on Aug 3 2014 9:33PM by Attorney, Jason A. Lee
|
Analysis: The Tennessee Legislature made an interesting
change to the typical rule in
Tennessee that judgments are only good for ten years unless renewed
(See T.C.A. § 28-3-110 and Tennessee Rule of
Civil Procedure 69.04). The Tennessee Legislature in the 2014
Tennessee legislative session passed Public Chapter No. 596
which was signed into law by Governor Bill Haslam on March 28, 2014. This statute essentially
allows a party to make a judgment permanent (as opposed to the current law
where it expires after 10 years unless renewed) if the injury or death was
caused by criminal conduct. This act applies to any civil judgments that
go into effect after July 1, 2014.
Additionally, there is actually a way for this act to apply to judgments
entered before July 1, 2014, if a specific procedure is followed.
The new T.C.A. § 28-3-110(B)(1) provides
as follows:
(b)(1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a), there is no time
within which a judgment or decree of a court of record entered on or after July
1, 2014, must be acted upon in the following circumstances:
(A) The judgment is for the injury or death of a person that resulted
from the judgment debtor's criminal conduct; and
(B) The judgment debtor is convicted of a crim...
|
Continue
Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on Mar 3 2014 11:23PM by Attorney, Jason A. Lee
|
Analysis: The Tennessee wrongful death statute is found
in T.C.A.
§ 20-5-106 and T.C.A.
§ 20-5-107. A specific provision in
this statute provides that the right to institute and collect any proceeds from
a wrongful death action is prohibited for certain surviving spouses. Specifically, if the children and next of kin
establish the surviving spouse abandoned the deceased spouse or willfully
withdrew for a period of two years, then the surviving spouse cannot recover
under the Tennessee wrongful death statute.
Specifically, T.C.A.
§ 20-5-107(e)(1) and (2) provides as follows:
(e)(1)
Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the right to institute and the
right to collect any proceeds from a wrongful death action granted by this
section to a surviving spouse shall be waived, if the children or next of kin
establish the surviving spouse has abandoned the deceased spouse as described
in § 36-4-101(a)(13) or
otherwise willfully withdrawn for a period of two (2) years.
(2) If the period
of two (2) years has passed since the time of abandonment or willful withdrawal
then there is created a rebuttable presumption that the surviving spouse
abandoned the deceased spouse for purposes of this section.
So, what is the definition of “abandonment”
of a spouse as described in this statute?
This definition is found in T.C.A. §
36-4-101(a)(13) which provides as follows:
(13) The husband
or wife has abandoned the spouse or turned the spouse out of doors for no just
cause, and has refused or neglected to provide for the spouse while having the
ability to so pro...
|
Continue
Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on Nov 25 2013 9:40AM by Attorney, Jason A. Lee
|
Analysis: Tennessee has a statute that address whether
a parent can recover in a wrongful death cause of action when they have not
paid child support. Specifically, T.C.A. § 20-5-107 provides that a
parent cannot recover through a wrongful death action until all child support
obligations, along with interest, have been paid. T.C.A. §
20-5-107(b)
provides as follows:
(b) In no event
shall a parent be permitted to recover through an action commenced pursuant to
subsection (a) until all child support arrearages, together with interest on
the child support arrearages, at the legal rate of interest computed from the
date each payment was due, have been paid in full to the parent ordered to
receive the support or to the parent's estate if deceased.
Additionally, a parent who has
intentionally refused and neglected to pay child support for a two year period (or
for the life of the child if it is less) can be prevented from recovering under
the Tennessee wrongful death statute under certain circumstances. If this person was subject to a court order
requiring payment of child support and failed to do so and if they
intentionally refused or neglected to contact the child or exercise visitation
rights, then they are not permitted to recover for a wrongful death action in
Tennessee on behalf of their child.
Specifically, T.C.A. §
20-5-107(c)
provides as follows:
(c) Notwithstanding
any law to the contrary, a parent who has intentionally refused or neglected to
pay any support for a child for a two-year period, or for the life of the
child, whichever is less, when subject to a court order requiring the payment
of child support and who has intentionally refused or neglected to contact the
child or exercise visitation during such period, shall not be permitted to
recover through an action commenced pursuant to subsection (a) and § 20-5-106.
|
Continue
Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on Jun 17 2013 8:40AM by Attorney, Jason A. Lee
|
Analysis: The Tennessee legislature passed Public Chapter No. 197 which was signed into
law by Governor Bill Haslam on April 23, 2013.
Public Chapter No.
197
provides a new requirement for almost every kind of health care practitioner or
health care facility that provides health care to prenatal patients or
newborns. This bill requires these health
care providers to provide infant CPR “information and instruction concerning
the appropriate use and techniques of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation
(CPR).” TCA § 68-5-___ (the new bill did not designate a specific section for
the statute but that will be done shortly).
This new law goes into effect on July 1, 2013.
The information and instruction is required
to be provided to one (1) parent or caregiver of the newborn infant. It is also important to point out that this
new statute does not go as far as requiring classes in certification for infant
CPR. The entire text of this new statute
is as follows:
§68-5-____
(a) Hospitals, birthing centers, health care
facilities, physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants or other
health care practitioners who provide medical care to newborns as well as
obstetricians who provide routine care for prenatal patients shall make
available information and instruction concerning the appropriate use of
techniques of infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to at least one (1)
parent or caregiver of a newborn infant.
Nothing in this section shall require classes in certification of infant
CPR. This section shall also not
constitute a requirement to be assessed during any inspection under Chapter 11,
part 2 of this title.
(b) Any facility or practitioner acting
within the scope of their licensure or practice shall be immune from any civil
liability under this section and shall have an affirmative defense to...
|
Continue
Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on Apr 11 2013 3:04PM by Attorney, Jason A. Lee
|
Analysis: The Tennessee Supreme Court recently decided a case pertaining to the liability of an assisted living facility's management company for failing to provide appropriate staff to the facility (Celebration Way facility). Wilson v. Americare Systems, Inc., No. M2011-00240-SC-R11-CV, 2013 WL 658078 (Tenn. 2013). At trial the jury found the management company (Americare Systems, Inc.) of an assisted living facility was negligent, causing the death of a resident, based on the fact it understaffed the facility. Wilson at 1. The resident of the facility, Mable Farrar, died from a perforated colon. The testimony at trial showed that the assisted living facility failed to follow Ms. Farrar’s physician’s order to administer medicine for constipation. Wilson at 1. As a result of this failure to provide the prescribed medicine, Ms. Farrar became significantly constipated and her doctor therefore ordered the assisted living facility to give her three to four enemas a day. Wilson at 1. The assisted living facility only gave Ms. Farrar one enema on the first day after the order, none on the second day and one on the third day. On the third day, after she received the enema, her colon perforated and she died. Wilson at 1, 2. The testimony at trial established she should not have been provided an enema by the facility nurse based on her physical status at that time.
Testimony at trial showed there were only two licensed nurses that worked at this facility. Wilson at 7. One of the nurses testified she was "always on call, twenty-four hours a day". Wilson at 7. The two licensed nurses had to cover a lot of shifts and were not paid overtime compensation because they were salaried employees. Wilson at 7. The nurses that worked at the facility as well as the regional operations director for the assisted living facility management company testified there were staffing problems at the facility. There were numerous complaints from the staff at the facility requesting additional staffing in order to be able to provide adequate care for the residents. Wilson at 6-8. Despite these complaints, no additional staffing was provided to the facility. Wilson at 7, 8
|
Continue
Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted on Aug 23 2012 8:13AM by Attorney, Jason A. Lee
|
This post will address the statutes of limitation for several common Tennessee causes of action. I will also provide the Tennessee statute that is the source for the statutes of limitation for each cause of action.
It must be noted that fact specific inquiries need to be completed for each and every case. Each case could have specific facts that could impact whether the statute of limitations bars a particular claim. The “discovery rule” is one doctrine that has been applied to some Tennessee causes of action. The Tennessee Supreme Court has found the discovery rule “provides that the statute of limitations begins to run when the injury is discovered, or in the exercise of reasonable care and diligence, the injury should have been discovered. The rule responds to the unfairness of requiring that he [a plaintiff] sue to vindicate a non-existent wrong, at a time when injury is unknown and unknowable.” Quality Auto Parts v. Bluff City Buick, 876 S.W.2d. 818, 820 (Tenn. 1994). There are other potential exceptions to Tennessee statutes of limitation including exceptions for minors or those deemed incompetent under certain circumstances. See T.C.A. § 28-1-106.
The causes of action and the Tennessee statute of limitation for each are as follows:
1. Slander - "within six (6) months after the words are uttered." (See T.C.A. § 28-3-103)
2. Civil actions for compensatory or punitive damages brought under the Federal Civil Rights statutes - 1 year statute of limitation (See T.C.A. § 28-3-104(a)(3))
3. False Imprisonment - 1 year statute of limitation (See T.C.A. § 28-3-104(a)(1))
|
Continue
Reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|